I owned my fabric collage quilt “Elements” for such a brief time that it was lovely to visit with it when it was borrowed back from the owner to be included in my New England Quilt Museum show at the end of 2018. While I had access to it, I did a short “video tour” of the quilt, included below.

As I explain in its original Quilt Story (first posted in February 2016), “Elements” was a turning point for me and my career as an artist. A number of factors made this an important quilt: the use of non-literal colors, the unique design, and of course the encouragement I received from its warm reception.

Looking back, I see that the decision to use non-literal colors was a brave one. One thing that helped was that I made this quilt for myself. I didn’t make it as a commission for a client or even in order to sell it. In fact, the only reason it sold was that in order to be in the New Hampshire League of Craftsmen “Living with Crafts” exhibit it had to be for sale. So I put a high price on it that I thought would discourage all but the most avid collector. It was rather a bittersweet surprise when it did sell.

Perhaps because of the quilts they see in this blog, or due to my encouragement, many of my students nowadays come to class expecting to use non-realistic colors. They make blue wolves or orange big horn sheep or purple bears. They say, “I’m going to be brave and make my dog in greens!”

Personally, I think this is wonderful. I’m pleased to think that I’m contributing to a more vibrant world by encouraging my students to use color in a brave and exuberant way.

It all started with “Elements.”


Original Post

elements
This is “Elements” (1993, 45 x 45 inches. And yes, it is supposed to be viewed “on point.”

I seem to learn something from every quilt I make, like how to shape fabric around a curve (Golden Temple of the Good Girls) or how to hang a 22-foot long quilt (Crocodylus Smylus).

But some quilts are turning points. They mark a change in style, a way thinking, a way of seeing. “Elements” was such a turning point for me.

The quilt was inspired by a guild challenge: create a representation of the four elements—earth, air, water, and fire—in fabric. This was in 1993. Most of my quilts before that time had been portraits of people. I had just finished “Surprise Me,” a realistic portrait of my husband and his two college buddies. So of course I immediately thought of making a personification of each element.

But how to compose such a work?

I needed some sort of organizing structure to give me a starting point. I did some pencil sketches. I don’t remember other ideas I might have considered but not used. Eventually, I settled on a globe around which the four “earthly elements” would be arranged.

I don’t know why, but once I had the concept down it became clear that each element would be represented by a certain color. And then the circular format of course led to the idea of using the entire spectrum of color, one color blending to the next, like a huge color wheel.

Now all I needed were models for the portraits.

So I dug through my collection of snapshots. And yes, remember, this was 1993—they were snapshots. I was looking for nice closeups with appropriate expressions, and poses that I thought worked well in the composition. (Remember, 3/4 view is better than straight on.) As it turned out, though, I found that my choices also made sense of a sort according to the personalities of the models.

air
Air, or my little sis, Heidi

For Air, I chose a pic of my sister, Heidi. I liked the sweep of her hair and the angle of her head. Look how her eyes are focused ahead, as though bending into a gale. In her youth she was something of a free spirit, which seemed to suit the Air element.

water
Water, or my college roommate, Pam.

For Water, I wanted long flowing locks as though they were floating free in the depths of the sea, like seaweed. And while the ocean can obviously be a ferocious place, I wanted to make my Water calm and peaceful. This picture of my friend Pam, who at that time had beautiful long hair, reflected the serenity and empathy she projects in real life and was something I tried to capture in her portrait.

earth
Earth, or my mama, Meta.

Mother Earth may be a cliché, but the foundation of my life is my mama. So it seemed clear that she would be the personification of Earth. In this picture, her expression is ambiguous—a Mona Lisa expression—one that creates its own mystery. Is she smiling? I think so.

fire
Fire, or guess who?

I needed someone for Fire, but none of the women in my pile of photos seemed quite right. Then of course it became obvious who was missing from the group. The one person tying all of them together. Myself. So maybe I wouldn’t have chosen Fire for myself, but the others worked so well, by process of elimination, it fell to me.

My mother thinks that I was a little harsh—that I could have made Fire more flattering. But Fire wasn’t intended to be a perfect likeness. I needed Fire to be harsher, more consuming than I feel I am.

Turning Points

Look at the following three quilts:

surpriseme72dpi
“Surprise Me”, 1992 BE (Before Elements)
elements
“Elements,” 1993
Twilight
“Twilight,” 1994 AE (After Elements)

Notice any difference between “Surprise Me” and “Twilight”?

Yeah. Color. Lots of it.

The concept of personifying the elements gave me permission to use non-realistic colors. I’ve never required permission since then. I don’t think I have ever used “realistic” colors since then either, except in a few commissions.

I believe “Elements” would have been a turning point in my career no matter what, but it certainly helped that it received a very warm reception. That year I entered the quilt in the League of New Hampshire Craftsmen’s Annual Fair. It won the Best in Show at the Living With Crafts exhibit. Shortly after that I appeared on New Hampshire public television’s program “Crossroads.”

I think it’s an accepted fact, whether true or not, that an artist ought to pursue his or her craft without regard for recognition. The writer in his lonely garret. The painter selling his canvasses on street corners. The singer-songwriter strumming in the subway. We expect them to be satisfied with the coins we toss into their hats. We assume that artists don’t need recognition at all if they are really, truly dedicated to their art.

I’m not sure I believe that. After all, other than “More is better,” my husband says my motto is:

“All art is good art.”

I try to respond to art that way, to meet it where it stands rather than forcing it to meet my expectations of it.

I see beginning artists in every one of my classes. I don’t expect them to progress without an encouraging word. Why would I expect that of anyone else? Why would I expect that of myself?

Would I have continued to make quilts even if “Elements” hadn’t received so much positive attention? Probably. Eventually. Instead, the response it received accelerated my commitment to being an artist.

Who knows where I would be today if not for “Elements.”

8 Comments

  • Susan, I am truly inspired by your work! I have only done 1 complete piece and am working on my second. Inspiration. Recognition. They go hand in hand for me. My first piece was one I randomly decided to do from a picture. After I started it, I received an invitation in the mail to a college graduation celebration of a young lady that I had become friends with. Serendipity stepped in because the piece I was working on was a pig. The graduate had fallen in love with pigs as a young girl, bought and raised and sold them all on her own (her parents were NOT pig farmers!) while in high school and has fallen in love with a guy who raises them. The pig I was making HAD to go to her! So, it did. She cried. She said it was the best gift she had ever received! Her mother raved about my talent (really, I’m not THAT good). This all encouraged me to become even more excited! I had shown the pig to another friend who raises cattle and she immediately wanted me to make her a cow! I had also shared my pig on social media and received an overwhelming response of positive comments. The cow has received even more! That has me SO excited! It has encouraged me that, maybe, just maybe, I have stumbled onto my true creative outlet! Thank you so much for your willingess to share your process. P.S. I did purchase your book “Serendipity Quilts” when I first started brewing about trying collage quilting and have used it as a reference for several of the procedures involved.

  • I loved reading the back story of Elements and seeing this transition in your work, both in the use of color and personification of objects. Having our art appreciated by others really feeds our soul. I have enjoyed some sales through the years, though I don’t work at marketing. Recently when my church needed some art (preferably textile) to bring color and warmth to our fellowship hall, we hung six of my quilts. Getting into shows and exhibits is a boost, but bringing my art to my best friends and having them appreciate and enjoy it for an extended period has been a special joy.

  • From the very first time I saw your art work, 10 years ago, I have been drawn to your techniques. I love the conceptual aspects of color and value leading to the interpretation of a piece. It brings a certain freedom and works with any subject. I can see now why you have followers who take your classes more than one or two times. Some ah ha moment occurs each time you explain a technique or just provide an observation as you pass by our work. Thank you for all that you share with us.

  • I am just finishing a challenge here in NZ and thinking about the next move I might make. I am drawn to the concept of elements or Greek deities or perhaps Maori legends. I wonder, I wonder , I wonder. Your post has given me inspiration and thoughts to ponder on non realistic colouring

  • This was the quilt I first noticed of your work. It was and is awesome.
    The concept, execution, and color story is perfect. So glad it has brought you the recognition you so richly deserve.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *